Figure 1
But
wait! With a synchronized flow, and
actively implementing system subordination, there is a very high probability
that the performance metric of efficiency will deteriorate quickly, at least
for some period of time. It will
manifest an unacceptable efficiency performance metric that is considered
undesirable by most companies. The new
mantra will be to “stop the synchronization nonsense and improve the
efficiency.” Be careful what you
consider to be nonsense. In this case,
the real nonsense is the efficiency metric.
When the synchronized flow is implemented, then excess capacity at
nonconstraints will be quickly exposed, at least for some period of time. Based on the efficiency metrics it will
appear that everything is falling apart, and you are headed in the wrong
direction. But through time, the new
system reality and thinking will expose new evidence about what is actually
happening in the system. The new reality
is this:
- Throughput rates will increase.
- Lead times through the system will be reduced.
- Work-in-process inventory will go down.
- On-time delivery will improve.
Types of
Constraints
Constraints
can exist in one of two types. The first
type is the internal constraint— which means that the market demand for your
product is higher than the capacity of the system to produce it. Customers want much more of what you offer
then what you can produce. It’s a good
situation to be in, but only up to a point.
If you can’t figure out a way to meet market demand, then your
competitors will usually figure out a way to do it for you. This situation is ideal for implementing
traditional DBR to meet the demand and capture more market (Figure 2).
Figure 2
In my next post, we will complete our discussion on different types of constraints and then we'll discuss two completely different forms of Drum Buffer Rope.
Bob Sproull
No comments:
Post a Comment