The Goal Tree Part 9
Review
In my last post the leadership team was able to convert all of the “red” entities into either green or yellow ones by simply implementing their new scheduling method, Drum Buffer Rope. As a refresher, the figure below is this team’s final product.
In
today’s post, we will demonstrate how we are able to, using the Goal Tree/IO
Map, develop performance metrics to track the organization’s status and
progress.
Performance Metrics
Before we develop
our performance metrics, let’s first discuss the purposes of an organization’s
performance metrics. In general, we need
some type of feedback mechanism that tells us how we’re doing, a way to be able
to know that the direction we’re traveling is on course in the event that we
need to make any midcourse corrections. These performance metrics should be
system related in that they tell us how the system is doing versus how an
individual process is functioning. Remember, our focus is on system performance
and not individual performance. So what should our performance metrics be? Before
we answer that question, let’s talk about their purpose.
Performance measures are
intended to serve six important functions or roles:
- First,
and foremost, the measures should stimulate the right behaviors.
- The
performance measures should reinforce and support the overall goals and
objectives of the company.
- The
measures should be able to assess, evaluate and provide feedback as to the
status of the people, departments, products, and the total company.
- The performance measure must be translatable to everyone
within the organization. That is, each operator, manager, engineer, etc.
must understand how their actions impact the metric. Performance metrics
are intended to inform everyone, not just the managers!
- The performance metrics chosen should also lend
themselves to trend and statistical analysis and, as such, they shouldn’t
be “yes or no” in terms of compliance.
- The metric should also be challenging, but at the same
time be attainable. There should be a stretch involved. If it’s too easy
to reach the target, then you probably won’t gain much in the way of
profitability. If it’s too difficult, then people will be frustrated and
disenchanted.
So with these functions in mind, let’s now look at how we can use our Goal Tree/IO Map to create our series of performance metrics.
Creating Performance Metrics
If we use the Goal Tree/IO Map as our guide, we should start with our goal, Maximize Profitability Now and In the Future, and create our first tracking metric. Some posts back I introduced you to Throughput Accounting which defined Net Profit as Throughput minus Operating Expense or NP = T – OE. The metric of choice for this Goal Tree/IO Map then is NP which we insert into our “goal box.” In addition, I prefer to give most of the metrics a target to attempt to achieve which in this metric we will include, NP >15% (i.e. Net Profit greater than 15%). We then look at each CSF and NC and select appropriate performance metric targets for as many as might be appropriate.
Because the operational status of companies varies from company to company, there is no standard set of metrics and targets to recommend, but for the company in this series of posts, the following set of metrics and targets have been inserted. Your company’s leadership team should be charged with establishing both the performance metrics and targets.
Next Time
This completes our series of posts on the Goal Tree/IO Map. In my next posting we will begin a new discussion on a different subject. As always, if you have any questions or comments about any of my posts, leave me a message and I will respond.
Until next time.
Bob Sproull
References:
[1] Dettmer, H. William. The Logical
Thinking Process: A Systems Approach to Complex Problem Solving. Milwaukee,
WI: ASQ Quality Press, 2007
No comments:
Post a Comment