In my last post we completed our discussion on the
Ultimate Improvement Cycle (UIC) by presenting the deliverables you should
achieve as you complete your first rotation of this cycle. In this post we will continue our discussion on
the UIC and dig a bit deeper into what you can expect to happen as you complete
the cycle.
The UIC accomplishes five primary objectives that
serve as a springboard to maximize revenue and profits as follows:
- It guarantees that you are focusing on the correct area of the process or system, to maximize throughput and minimize operating expense and inventory.
- It provides a roadmap for improvement to ensure a systematic, structured and orderly approach to improvement, to maximize the utilization of your improvement resources.
- It integrates the best of Lean, Six Sigma and TOC strategies to maximize your organization’s full improvement potential.
- It ensures that the necessary up-front planning is completed in advance of changes to the process or organization, so as to avoid the “fire, ready, aim” mindset.
- It facilitates the synergy and involvement of the entire organization, needed to maximize your full return on investment. In short, you will see a “jump” in profitability!
Step
1a
I will now discuss, in more depth, each step required
to achieve these five primary objectives. Step 1 can best be characterized in
one word—Identify. As stated earlier, all of Step 1 is a series of activities
aimed at identifying, rather than taking action on. What we are attempting to
do in this first step is collect information that will become the basis for our
well-conceived action plan for improvement. So, as you go through Step 1, we
know there will be a near-irresistible urge to make changes, but don’t do it
yet. The success of the UIC is dependent on the development of a coherent plan
and avoiding the “fire, ready, aim” scenario that has become one of the primary
causes of failure of many improvement initiatives. Resist this urge!
In Step 1, I have combined identification of the value
stream, from the Lean cycle; identification of performance metrics, from Six
Sigma; and identification of the current and next constraint from the Theory of
Constraints. The flow and inventory analysis is completed by simply reviewing
the completed current state VSM or Process Map for location, and volume of
inventory within the system. The performance metrics analysis is done by
meeting with all departments and leaders to determine what metrics are tracked
at all levels of the organization. If your company is like many others, you
will be surprised by the number of performance metrics tracked. We also
recommend that you determine how the metrics are communicated throughout the
organization.
Identifying the current and next constraint is the
most important activity in Step 1, simply because the constraint will become
the focal point for most of your improvement activities. One of the easiest
ways to locate the constraint is by walking the process with your team, during
the development of the current state VSM or a Process Map. As you walk this
process, you will be identifying both the location and volume of raw material,
WIP and finished goods inventory. Typically, the location that has the highest
level of inventory will be the current constraint, and the step with the next
highest level will be the next constraint, but not always. Look also for
policies and procedures that have been implemented that might be policy
constraints. An example might be using the performance metrics, manpower
efficiency or equipment utilization in every process step. Take your time and
do it right, because it will be worth it in the end. Remember, the operative
word here is to simply identify, and not take action, just yet. So, how do you
identify the right performance metrics? In my next post we will answer this
question and continue on our cycle of improvement.
Bob Sproull
2 comments:
Hi Bob
Unfortunately I haven't read your book yet, so what I'm about to say might be covered in there, but I was wondering if "choking the release" shouldn't be part of the potential tools for identifying the constraint? Particularly in systems with high variability in the type of work flowing through it can be very difficult to identify the constraint. I think an entire chapter could easily go into how to use choking to create flow and at least a very informative blog post :)
Yes Rasmus, you are correct with your assumption. Systems with high variability can make it difficult to identify the system constraint. Hope all is well with you and that your career is progressing nicely.
Bob
Post a Comment