Variation
For years, if not decades, people and organizations have dedicated considerable time and effort to remove variation from systems. The utopian goal is to remove as much variation as possible from the system. No matter how much planning is employed, no matter how much effort is extended, variation will still exist! If you were asked; how long it takes you to get to work every day, your response might be something like, “about thirty minutes.” The instant you answer with the word “about,” you have introduced variation into the system. You know that historically speaking, some days you get to work in twenty-five minutes and yet others days it can take thirty-five or forty minutes. In your “get to work” system, things can happen that will either speed up the process or slow it down.
Variation
exists in everything, especially within a system. You understand that some
processes will produce at a faster or slower rate than others, and this is the
premise behind variation. Because of variation, the output from a system will
not be linear, but rather it will operate within a range that changes. This variable range is known as statistical
fluctuation, and it exists in every system.
It’s important to understand that you cannot make variation go
away. The theory and practice of Six
Sigma has pioneered the race to variation reduction. But even with the most valiant efforts of
time and money, not all variation can be removed. You can reduce the amount and severity of
variation, but it will still exist. Once
you understand that variation is a constant variable in any system, it’s easier
to understand that at some point you will reach the minimum variation that is
controllable in the system, and any efforts to reduce variation beyond that
point are fruitless. Perhaps, instead of
spending so much time and effort on techniques to remove variation, the focus
should really be on techniques to manage variation.
With the
constraining operation identified, you have collectively quarantined the “drum”
beat for your system. Knowing the
drumbeat is of strategic importance to implement and gain any system
improvements. The drum provides you with
the necessary information of knowing where to focus your improvement efforts. Historically, many organizations can and do
conduct many improvement projects on a yearly basis. The mantra seems to be that every
organization and every process should strive for improvement. The thought is that each organization is
improving at some level of frequency to make the whole system better. However, the sum of many efforts does not
always equal what is good for the whole.
The problem with this type of thinking
is it is a totally unfocused shotgun approach to solve the problem. In effect, it presents an improvement policy
that states: if I select a wide enough range, then I should hit the target, or
at least come close to the target. When
you take the shotgun approach you might hit everything a little bit, but miss
the full impact required to make real change and improvements. If your shotgun approach includes trying to
improve non-constraints, and most do, then the system as a whole gains
nothing! The improvement of
non-constraints in isolation of the entire system, without a comprehensive
analysis, is just a way of dealing with symptoms and not the real issue
(constraint). Without the ability and
the accurate information necessary to focus on the real issues, the disease
goes merrily on. Improvement of
non-constraints is a noble gesture, but one that yields little, if any, real
improvements. Every process within a
system does not need to be improved at the same time! Some system processes are more important than
others. Without knowing where your
constraint resides, your efforts to improve will be unfocused and consequently
worthless, serving only to consume large amounts of money, resources, and time.
In my next post, we'll dive deeper into Goldratt's second step.....Exploitation
Bob Sproull
No comments:
Post a Comment