In this blog post, I will be continuing to present
highlights from my newest book, Theory of Constraints, Lean, and Six Sigma
Improvement Methodology: Making the Case for Integration, which was just
released. This series is taken from the
Preface of this new book and I hope you enjoy this series. In my last post in this series, I continued
discussing some of my early learnings gained throughout my career and in this
post I will continue along these lines.
As time passed, I felt like there was some kind of
missing link in my arsenal of improvement tools, and then it happened. Eventually, in addition to my basic Lean and
Six Sigma training, I studied hard and eventually became a Lean Six Sigma
Master Black Belt. But then the epiphany
happened when I learned about the Theory of Constraints (TOC). I studied hard and eventually became what is
referred to as a TOC Jonah. I had discovered
what this missing link was and that something was called the Theory of
Constraints (TOC). Once I learned the
details of TOC, my ability to make fast, major improvements jettisoned upward
to levels I had not experienced before.
I must say that I was shocked, in that I couldn’t imagine why I had not
come across this missing link before.
And as the title of this book suggests, the Theory of Constraints played
a pivotal role in how I approach improvement.
As you will see, an integrated TOC, Lean and Six Sigma is the common
denominator in all of my case studies presented in this book.
Prior to learning about the Theory of Constraints, it
was not uncommon for me to focus on individual parts of processes and improve
them. I assumed that the sum total of
these isolated improvements would result in system-wide improvements. After all, when you improve any part of a
process, the system automatically improves. Right? But as I discovered, after learning about the
Theory of Constraints, my assumptions were clearly erroneous! The sum total of improvements to isolated
parts of a system, does not translate into system-wide improvement. This fact dramatically changed my entire
approach to improvement. The fact is,
the only way the system will be improved is by focusing your improvement
efforts on that part of the system that is limiting it!
Years later, the same CEO that wanted me to close the
plant in Kentucky, called me and asked me to join him at another manufacturing
company which produced truck bodies. This
time, my role was to be in charge of their continuous improvement effort. Needless to say, I accepted his offer, but
soon after I arrived, he fired the VP of Engineering and asked me to absorb
Engineering into my span of control. I
reluctantly agreed, and to my dismay, I found the Engineering group was in
serious trouble. In trouble because of
the length of time in which they completed their engineering work so as to be
able to bid on new jobs. And to make
matters worse, the morale in Engineering was in the tank. In one of the later chapters, I will present
what happened at this facility in a case study format.
In my next post, I will continue to present details
about my newest book, Theory of Constraints, Lean, and Six Sigma Improvement
Methodology: Making the Case for Integration.
Bob Sproull
No comments:
Post a Comment