In my preceding posts on Throughput
Accounting I focused my attention on how Constraints Management works in
manufacturing and service industries. I
now want to turn my attention on the Accounting Department. Again, for those of you who are just joining this
discussion, I am recommending that you purchase a wonderful book by Steven
Braggs, Throughput Accounting – A Guide
to Constraint Management. In this
posting I want to present, word-for-word how Bragg presents his message
directly to the Accounting Department.
“In a traditional accounting environment, the
accountant is trained to focus on product costs, usually in extraordinary
detail, rather than on the ability of the company to generate profits. Conversely, throughput accounting is least
concerned with costs and more concerned with using the existing system (and the
costs built into it) to generate the largest amount of profit. Which concept is right?”
“Under the traditional cost accounting
approach, if the accountant is solely reporting on the cost of operations, then
it is reasonable for management’s attention to be skewed in the direction of
cost management, since this is the only information they see. However, nearly all costs fall into the
Operating Expenses category of costs, and the primary purpose of that cost
category is to support the ability of the company to produce throughput. Thus, an excessive degree of attention to
cost reduction will eventually impact a company’s ability to produce
throughput, so that profits may decline even faster than any cost reductions
that have been achieved.”
“The problem is especially difficult to
perceive when the accountant identifies an excessive level of capacity in a
nonconstraint area, and proposes that the company save money by eliminating some
portion of the excess capacity. What the
accountant misses is how important that excess capacity might be.”
Bragg explains that the total capacity at
each work center should be divided into three parts as follows:
- Productive capacity which is that portion of the work center capacity needed to process currently scheduled production or service.
- Protective capacity which is the additional portion of capacity that must be held in reserve to ensure that a sufficient quantity of parts or patients can be manufactured or serviced to adequately feed the bottleneck operation.
- Idle
capacity which is the left over capacity other than productive or
protective capacity. Only the idle
capacity can be eliminated from a work center.
Bragg goes on to explain that if the capacity
to be eliminated is protective capacity and not idle capacity, then the
constrained resource will not have any inventory on which to work, and must
shut down until its inventory inflow can be replenished. So while the reduction in capacity in order
to cut costs may seem like a reasonable decision in the short term, in the long
term if demand increases, it would be the wrong approach.
Bragg goes on to explain that Throughput
Accounting takes the opposite approach to financial analysis, focusing instead
on improving the utilization of the constrained resource in order to maximize
profits through increases in throughput.
It is designed to answer three questions regarding management decisions,
which are:
- What is the decision’s impact on throughput (top priority)?
- What is the decision’s impact on investment (second priority)?
- What is the decision’s impact on operating
expenses (last priority)?
As you can see, the strongest emphasis is on
increasing throughput while the least emphasis is on reducing operating
expenses. The primary reason that
operating expenses are considered the least important is that a large portion
of operating expenses are need to support the system’s capacity to create
throughput.
In reality, both systems (CA and TA) focus on
profit improvement, but throughput accounting takes the path of doing so by
increasing throughput while costs accounting choses the path of cost
reduction. So even though both systems
are attempting to achieve the same goal, it is my belief (and Bragg’s) that the
more effective pathway is through enhancing throughput. Why?
Simply because there is no theoretical upper limit to throughput, but
there certainly is a lower limit to cost reduction.
In my nest posting we’ll continue to look at
the stark differences between Throughput Accounting and Cost Accounting and why
one is so much better than the other for real time financial decisions.
Bob Sproull
No comments:
Post a Comment