My blog is focused primarily on the Theory of Constraints and how to use it to maximize the profitability of any company. I also discuss why integrating TOC with Lean and Six Sigma is the most dynamic improvement methodology available today.
Sunday, November 9, 2014
Focus and Leverage Part 391
In my last
posting section I told you not to just jump right into the UIC methodology and begin the
improvement process. If your entire
operation is able to accept the prerequisite beliefs of constraint leverage and focus, then you have taken the first step. When I say the entire operation, I am
referring to everyone! All of the
individual departments, functional groups, and employees in your organization must
become focused on the leveraging power of the constraining operation. If you can’t do that, then there simply is no
need to continue. Accounting, Purchasing,
Engineering, Sales and Marketing, Production, Production Control, Quality, Maintenance,
etc. all must be aligned and in total agreement. Unless and until all functional groups within
your organization are singing from the same sheet of music, you simply will not
make any progress. So the first
prerequisite is that your entire organization must accept the idea that the key
to improvement is recognizing the power of focus and leverage. That is, in order to increase throughput, and
ultimately profitability, you must leverage your constraint operation by
focusing all of your improvement resources on it. So let's look at the other nine Prerequisite Beliefs that I believe must be in place and accepted by all.
The second
belief that must be accepted by your entire organization is the concept of subordination. Subordination simply means that every
decision made and every action taken by the entire organization must be done so
based on its impact on the constraining resource. And when I say the entire organization, I
mean everyone! Accounting must provide real time decision-making information to
the organization and not hold onto financial measures that are based on what
happened last month (i.e. Cost Accounting and GAAP).
Accounting must also eliminate outdated
performance metrics like utilization and efficiency in non-constraint operations because they mean absolutely nothing. All these two metrics really do is create an
environment that fosters and promotes over-production, resulting in higher
carrying costs, extended lead times and excess inventory. I want to add that GAAP reporting rules must be followed, but when GAAP was formed, it was never intended to be used to make routine financial decisions.
Purchasing must
order parts and materials based upon the rate of consumption at the constraint
and stop ordering in large quantities
or only on the basis of lowest cost to satisfy another outdated performance
metric, purchase price variance. Sales and Marketing must understand that
unless and until the current constraint is broken, they must not make hollow
promises on delivery dates in order to obtain more orders to supplement their
sales commissions. Engineering must
respond quickly to the needs of production to assure timely delivery and updates
to specifications. Maintenance must
always prioritize their work based upon the needs of the constraining operation
including preventive and reactive maintenance activities. If there is an inspection station that
impacts the constraint throughput, then inspectors (if they exist) must always
provide timely and accurate inspections so as to never cause delays that negatively
impact the flow of materials into and out of the constraint. Finally, Production Control must stop
scheduling the plant on forecasts that we know are wrong using the outdated
algorithms contained within typical MRP systems.
If your entire
organization believes in and is ready to subordinate to the constraint, then
you have taken the second step. If your
organization is like so many others where individual departments exist as
silos, then letting go of the apparent control that they now have will be a
difficult pill to swallow, but one that is absolutely necessary. If you’re not ready, then do not proceed any
further!
The third belief
that must be accepted by the entire organization is that improvement is never-ending. The Ultimate Improvement Cycle is predicated
on the fact that once a constraint is broken, a new one will appear immediately,
so all organizational resources must be prepared to shift to it and subordinate
actions and decisions toward the cycle of breaking the new constraint. This cyclical process has no end, so be
prepared to accept the idea of always getting better.
The fourth belief
that the organization must accept is one of involvement
of the entire workforce. If you are
like many other companies who practice traditional Cost Accounting practices,
then you’ve probably been taught that improving profits means reducing
expenses. And reducing expenses has
typically involved reducing the size of the labor force. This is exactly opposite of the behavior that
is needed to successfully navigate through the UIC. Why would anyone be willing to participate in
improving the operation to the point that they lose their job? So if, in the past, you are a company that
uses layoffs as a way of reducing or controlling expenses, then you are doomed
to failure! You must accept the fact
that the key to making money now is increasing throughput and without
everyone’s involvement, it simply won’t happen.
So if you can’t accept this belief, then stop here.
As you identify
the constraint and subordinate the rest of the organization to the constraint,
there will be idle time at the non-constraints.
If you are like many organizations that use total system efficiency and
utilization as key performance metrics, then you will see both of them predictably
decline. You are normally trying to drive
efficiencies and utilizations higher and higher at each of the individual operations
under the mistaken assumption that the
total efficiency of the system is sum of the individual efficiencies. In a TOC environment the only efficiencies or
utilizations that really matter are those measured in the constraint operation. You may even be using work piece incentives
in an effort to get your operators to produce more and I’m sure many of you are
using variances as a key performance metric.
Efficiencies, utilizations, incentives and variances are all counterproductive! So the fifth belief in preparing for the
implementation of the UIC that must be accepted is abandoning outdated performance metrics, incentives and variances. If you are unwilling to do this, then don’t
attempt to use the UIC!
In my next
posting I will lay out the remaining Prerequisite Beliefs (i.e.six through ten).
Bob Sproull
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment