http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Throughput_accounting#Explanation
With this in mind, I have copied this discussion for posting here on my blog. The reason I am doing this is two-fold. First, this explanation of TA is one of the best I have come across for those not familiar with TA and second, in my next posting I will be using TA concepts to answer a question from one of my blog readers.
Throughput Accounting
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Throughput
Accounting (TA) is a
principle-based and simplified management accounting
approach that provides managers with decision support information for
enterprise profitability improvement. TA is relatively new in management
accounting. It is an approach that identifies factors that limit an
organization from reaching its goal, and then focuses on simple measures that
drive behavior in key areas towards reaching organizational goals. TA was
proposed by Eliyahu M. Goldratt[1] as an alternative to traditional cost accounting. As such, Throughput Accounting[2] is neither cost accounting nor costing because it is cash
focused and does not allocate all costs (variable and fixed expenses, including
overheads) to products and services sold or provided by an enterprise.
Considering the laws of variation, only costs that vary totally with units of
output (see definition of T below for TVC) e.g. raw materials, are allocated to
products and services which are deducted from sales to determine Throughput.
Throughput Accounting is a management accounting
technique used as the performance measure in the Theory of Constraints
(TOC).[3] It is the business intelligence used for maximizing
profits, however, unlike cost accounting that primarily focuses on 'cutting
costs' and reducing expenses to make a profit, Throughput Accounting primarily
focuses on generating more throughput. Conceptually, Throughput Accounting
seeks to increase the speed or rate at which throughput (see definition of T
below) is generated by products and services with respect to an organization's
constraint, whether the constraint is internal or external to the organization.
Throughput Accounting is the only management accounting methodology that
considers constraints as factors limiting the performance of organizations.
Management
accounting is an organization's internal set of techniques and methods used to
maximize shareholder wealth. Throughput Accounting is thus part of the
management accountants' toolkit, ensuring efficiency where it matters as well
as the overall effectiveness of the organization. It is an internal reporting
tool. Outside or external parties to a business depend on accounting reports
prepared by financial (public) accountants who apply Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles(GAAP) issued by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and enforced by the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other local and
international regulatory agencies and bodies such as International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
Throughput
Accounting improves profit performance with better management decisions by
using measurements that more closely reflect the effect of decisions on three
critical monetary variables (throughput, investment (AKA inventory), and operating expense — defined below).
History
When cost
accounting was developed in the 1890s, labor was the largest fraction of
product cost and could be considered a variable cost. Workers often did not
know how many hours they would work in a week when they reported on Monday
morning because time-keeping systems were rudimentary. Cost accountants,
therefore, concentrated on how efficiently managers used labor since it was
their most important variable resource. Now however, workers who come to work
on Monday morning almost always work 40 hours or more; their cost is fixed
rather than variable. However, today, many managers are still evaluated on
their labor efficiencies, and many "downsizing,"
"rightsizing," and other labor reduction campaigns are based on them.
Goldratt argues
that, under current conditions, labor efficiencies lead to decisions that harm
rather than help organizations. Throughput Accounting, therefore, removes
standard cost accounting's reliance on efficiencies in general, and labor
efficiency in particular, from management practice. Many cost and financial
accountants agree with Goldratt's critique, but they have not agreed on a
replacement of their own and there is enormous inertia in the installed base of
people trained to work with existing practices.
Constraints
accounting, which is a development in the Throughput Accounting field,
emphasizes the role of the constraint,
(referred to as the Archemedian constraint) in decision making.[4]
The concepts of Throughput Accounting
Goldratt's
alternative begins with the idea that each organization has a goal and that
better decisions increase its value. The goal for a profit maximizing firm is
easily stated, to increase profit now and in the future. Throughput Accounting
applies to not-for-profit
organizations too, but they have to develop a goal that makes sense in their
individual cases.
Throughput
Accounting also pays particular attention to the concept of 'bottleneck'
(referred to as constraint in the Theory of Constraints) in the
manufacturing or servicing processes.
Throughput
Accounting uses three measures of income and expense:
The chart
illustrates a typical throughput structure of income (sales) and expenses (TVC
and OE).
T=Sales less TVC and NP=T less OE.
T=Sales less TVC and NP=T less OE.
- Throughput
(T) is the rate at which the system produces "goal units." When
the goal units are money [5] (in for-profit businesses),
throughput is net sales (S) less totally variable cost (TVC), generally
the cost of the raw materials (T = S – TVC). Note that T only exists when
there is a sale of the product or service. Producing materials that sit in
a warehouse does not form part of throughput but rather investment.
("Throughput" is sometimes referred to as "throughput
contribution" and has similarities to the concept of
"contribution" in marginal costing which is sales revenues less
"variable" costs – "variable" being defined according
to the marginal costing philosophy.)
- Investment (I) is the money tied up in the
system. This is money associated with inventory, machinery, buildings, and
other assets and liabilities. In earlier Theory of
Constraints (TOC) documentation, the "I" was
interchanged between "inventory" and "investment." The
preferred term is now only "investment." Note that TOC
recommends inventory be valued strictly on totally variable cost
associated with creating the inventory, not with additional cost
allocations from overhead.
- Operating expense
(OE) is the money the system spends in generating "goal units."
For physical products, OE is all expenses except the cost of the raw
materials. OE includes maintenance, utilities, rent, taxes and payroll.
Organizations
that wish to increase their attainment of The Goal should therefore require managers to
test proposed decisions against three questions. Will the proposed change:
- Increase
throughput? How?
- Reduce
investment (inventory) (money that
cannot be used)? How?
- Reduce operating expense?
How?
The answers to
these questions determine the effect of proposed changes on system wide
measurements:
- Net profit (NP) = throughput – operating
expense = T – OE
- Return on investment
(ROI) = net profit / investment = NP/I
- TA Productivity = throughput / operating
expense = T/OE
- Investment
turns (IT) = throughput / investment = T/I
These
relationships between financial ratios as illustrated by Goldratt are very
similar to a set of relationships defined by DuPont and General Motors
financial executive Donaldson Brown
about 1920. Brown did not advocate changes in management accounting methods,
but instead used the ratios to evaluate traditional financial accounting data.
Throughput
Accounting [6] is an important development in modern accounting that
allows managers to understand the contribution of constrained resources to the
overall profitability of the enterprise.
Explanation
- Throughput = Sales revenue – Total Variable Costs7][8]
- Throughput Accounting Ratio = Return per factory
hour/Cost per factory hour
For example:
The railway coach company was offered a contract to make 15 open-topped
streetcars each month, using a design that included ornate brass foundry work,
but very little of the metalwork needed to produce a covered rail coach. The
buyer offered to pay $280 per streetcar. The company had a firm order for 40
rail coaches each month for $350 per unit.
The cost
accountant determined that the cost of operating the foundry vs. the metalwork
shop each month was as follows:
Overhead
Cost by Department
|
Total
Cost ($)
|
Hours
Available per month
|
Cost
per hour ($)
|
Foundry
|
7,300.00
|
160
|
45.63
|
Metal
shop
|
3,300.00
|
160
|
20.63
|
Total
|
10,600.00
|
320
|
33.13
|
The company was
at full capacity making 40 rail coaches each month. And since the foundry was
expensive to operate, and purchasing brass as a raw material for the streetcars
was expensive, the accountant determined that the company would lose money on
any streetcars it built. He showed an analysis of the estimated product costs
based on standard cost accounting and recommended that the company
decline to build any streetcars.
Standard
Cost Accounting Analysis
|
Streetcars
|
Rail
coach
|
Monthly
Demand
|
15
|
40
|
Price
|
$280
|
$350
|
Foundry
Time (hrs)
|
3.0
|
2.0
|
Metalwork
Time (hrs)
|
1.5
|
4.0
|
Total
Time
|
4.5
|
6.0
|
Foundry
Cost
|
$136.88
|
$
91.25
|
Metalwork
Cost
|
$
30.94
|
$
82.50
|
Raw
Material Cost
|
$120.00
|
$
60.00
|
Total
Cost
|
$287.81
|
$233.75
|
Profit
per Unit
|
$
(7.81)
|
$116.25
|
However, the
company's operations manager knew that recent investment in automated foundry
equipment had created idle time for workers in that department. The constraint
on production of the railcoaches was the metalwork shop. She made an analysis
of profit and loss if the company took the contract using throughput
accounting to determine the profitability of products by calculating
"throughput" (revenue less variable cost) in the metal shop.
Throughput
Cost Accounting Analysis
|
Decline
Contract
|
Take
Contract
|
Coaches
Produced
|
40
|
34
|
Streetcars
Produced
|
0
|
15
|
Foundry
Hours
|
80
|
113
|
Metal
shop Hours
|
160
|
159
|
Coach
Revenue
|
$14,000
|
$11,900
|
Streetcar
Revenue
|
$
0
|
$
4,200
|
Coach
Raw Material Cost
|
$(2,400)
|
$(2,040)
|
Streetcar
Raw Material Cost
|
$
0
|
$(1,800)
|
Throughput
Value
|
$11,600
|
$12,260
|
Overhead
Expense
|
$(10,600)
|
$(10,600)
|
Profit
|
$1,000
|
$1,660
|
After the
presentations from the company accountant and the operations manager, the
president understood that the metal shop capacity was limiting the company's
profitability. The company could make only 40 rail coaches per month. But by
taking the contract for the streetcars, the company could make nearly all the
railway coaches ordered, and also meet all the demand for streetcars. The
result would increase throughput in the metal shop from $6.25 to $10.38
per hour of available time, and increase profitability by 66 percent.
Relevance
One of the most
important aspects of Throughput Accounting is the relevance of the information
it produces. Throughput Accounting reports what currently happens in business
functions such as operations, distribution and marketing. It does not rely
solely on GAAP's financial accounting reports (that still need to be verified
by external auditors) and is thus relevant to current decisions made by
management that affect the business now and in the future. Throughput
Accounting is used in Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM),[9] Drum Buffer Rope (DBR)—in businesses that are internally
constrained, in Simplified Drum Buffer Rope (S-DBR) [10]—in businesses that are externally constrained
(particularly where the lack of customer orders denotes a market constraint),
as well as in strategy, planning and tactics, etc.
References
- Eliyahu M. Goldratt and Jeff Cox - The Goal - ISBN 0-620-33597-1.
- Thomas Corbett - Throughput Accounting - ISBN 0-88427-158-7
- Eric Noreen - Theory of Constraints and its Implications for Management Accounting - ISBN 978-0-88427-116-1
- John A. Caspari and Pamela Caspari - Management Dynamics - ISBN 0-471-67231-9
- Eliyahu M. Goldratt - The Haystack Syndrome (pp 19) - ISBN 0-88427-089-0
- Steven Bragg - Throughput Accounting - ISBN 978-0-471-25109-5
- Performance management, Paper f5. Kaplan publishing UK. Pg 17
- Performance management, Paper f5. Kaplan publishing UK. Pg 17
- Eliyahu M. Goldratt - Critical Chain - ISBN 0-620-21256-X
- Eli
Schragenheim and H William Dettmer - Manufacturing at Warp Speed - ISBN 1-57444-293-7
Bob Sproull
1 comment:
Need a fast business loan? speak to DS - they are awesome!
Post a Comment